“Begin at the beginning,"
the King said, very gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then
stop.” ― Lewis
Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
Now is a time to stop. As many
readers know, JSR is moving to an all digital format in 2013 – SEPM will no
longer print hard copies of the journal.
This change is a major shift in the journal, which has published on
paper continuously since 1931, as the oldest journal in sedimentary
geology. This change has been
coming for years, but apparently still surprises and disappoints some dedicated
JSR readers. For example, here is
a recent email note from an SEPM member, copied verbatim.
“Shocking news from SEPM concerning its politics to get out of general
printing of J. Sed. Res. and Palaios and to publish preferentially
electronically in future…. This might be the way of the 21th century, but I
always appreciated the days, when the new issues of the journals arrived at
home, to sit in a comfortable armchair, scroll through the content and to
read interesting or even stimulating contents. Last not least it was a pleasure
to put the issues on the shelf, where I assembled J. Sed.Pet. since 1981 and
Palaios from Vol. 1 (palaeontologists apparently are collectors). Compared to 2012, the subscription
prices for 2013 for “print on demand” increased in such an dramatic rate that I
will not afford that. I am not interested to receive electronic version for my
private pleasure. I therefore decided – and not so easily – to cancel my
membership … after 31 years.”
As with SEPM as a whole, we at JSR aim to
serve the community of sedimentary geologists and paleontologists, and so
receiving a letter like this is somewhat disturbing. As such, we would like to take the opportunity to briefly explain
some of the reasoning behind the decision.
SEPM journals form the financial backbone of
the society. The vast majority of
the society revenue comes from the journals, and this net positive revenue supports
the Special Publications, Annual Meetings, Special Conferences, and so on.
Historically, however, trends in journal expenses
and revenue are clear and illustrate that: 1) on-line versions are more
profitable than the print versions; 2) the number of those receiving hard
copies has steadily declined; and 3) continuing to print the paper versions has
become more and more expensive with time – actually representing a revenue
drain, for an increasingly smaller number of print subscribers. In fact, the society has published paper
editions of the journals at a net loss annually, estimated to be in excess of $75,000
for 2012. Although your humble
blogger has forgotten the numbers with that last glass of egg nog, the cost of printing
each and every issue of the year was
equal to the annual revenue from
subscribers – and the difference between the cost and the price paid was
basically subsidized by everyone else, those who elected to receive only the
electronic version.
[To be clear, however, SEPM does provide
Print-on-Demand at cost through a vendor.
Or you can print out your own hard copies. More info on POD will be forthcoming….]
These financial constraints worked in concert
with changing perceptions and utilization of journals. Increasing journal prices and
decreasing library budgets lead to constraints, and many libraries are opting
to go for only one version – the on-line version. Similarly, many (but certainly not all) of our consumers are
requesting ease of access – facilitated by on-line publications. The official version of JSR papers have
been on-line for years now,
and JSR is available your mobile device as well.
Although the majority of scientists suggest
they search and read journals on-line, it is true that many still enjoy reading
hard copies, including many SEPM members.
For us, the transition may be somewhat difficult – but we will make
it. But we hope is like one SEPM
council member said during the discussion of the transition – “…phasing
it out would be sort of like slowly pulling a band-aid off my hairy leg. Better to yank!”
In The Five
People You Meet In Heaven, Mitch Albom wrote,“All endings are also beginnings.
We just don't know it at the time.” We thank our readers for working
with us through this transition and we look forward to continuing to pursue
unique avenues for communicating the best science! We welcome your feedback.